Does Urine Therapy work?

No.

Urine therapy, also known as urotherapy or auto-urine therapy, is a controversial alternative medicine practice that involves using urine as a therapeutic agent. The practice involves drinking one’s own urine, using urine topically on the skin, or injecting urine into the bloodstream.

Proponents of urine therapy claim that it has a wide range of health benefits, such as boosting the immune system, improving digestion, treating skin conditions, and even curing cancer. However, there is no scientific evidence to support these claims, and most medical professionals strongly advise against using urine as a form of therapy.

In fact, urine can contain harmful bacteria, viruses, and toxins, particularly if the person has an underlying medical condition or infection. Drinking or applying urine can also lead to infection or irritation of the skin and mucous membranes. Therefore, it is not recommended to use urine therapy as a form of medical treatment.

Resources for Does Urine Therapy work??

Urine therapy (Wikipedia)
Is urine sterile? Do urine ‘therapies’ work? Experts debunk common pee myths (The Conversation)
Urine Therapy (PodiaPaedia)
Why Drinking Your Urine Isn’t Good for You (UPMC)
Should you pee on your chilblains to treat them?
Why Urine Therapy Is Actually Dangerous (Health)

Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

What is germ theory denialism?

Germ theory denialism is the nonsense that “germs” do not cause disease. They do.

Germ theory denialism is the belief that infectious diseases are not caused by microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. Germ theory denialists reject the scientific consensus that these microorganisms can cause illness and disease, and often promote alternative explanations, such as toxins, lifestyle factors, or even government conspiracies.

Germ theory denialism is not a new phenomenon and has been around for centuries. However, it gained renewed attention during the COVID-19 pandemic, with some individuals and groups promoting false and dangerous theories about the virus’s origin and spread, and rejecting the scientific consensus on vaccines and public health measures.

It is important to note that germ theory denialism is not supported by scientific evidence and can have serious consequences, including the spread of infectious diseases, unnecessary suffering, and loss of life.

Resources for: What is germ theory denialism?

From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_denialism
From the Conversation: https://theconversation.com/germ-theory-denialism-is-alive-and-well-and-taking-the-nuance-out-of-scientific-debate-163408
From PodiaPaedia: https://podiapaedia.org/wiki/research/pseudoscience/germ-theory-denialism/
From Rational Wiki: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Germ_theory_denialism
From Science Based Medicine: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/germ-theory-denial-in-the-age-of-the-covid-19-pandemic/

Please Note:

If you have any good peer reviewed science that says otherwise, please send it and if it stacks up to scrutiny it will be linked above.

Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)
Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Are chemtrails real?

Of course they are not. Its a fake, made up, silly conspiracy theory.

No, chemtrails are not real. The term “chemtrails” refers to the conspiracy theory that claims that the trails left by aircraft in the sky are not merely condensation trails (contrails) but actually contain chemicals or biological agents that are being sprayed for nefarious purposes.

However, this theory has been thoroughly debunked by scientists and aviation experts, who explain that contrails are a normal phenomenon that occurs when hot engine exhaust mixes with cold air, causing condensation to form. Contrails can persist for long periods depending on the weather conditions and altitude of the aircraft, but they do not contain any chemicals or biological agents.

Claims of chemtrails are often based on misinformation, misinterpretation of scientific data, or deliberate manipulation of evidence to promote a specific agenda. It is important to rely on factual and scientifically supported information when discussing topics related to public health and the environment.

Resources for Are chemtrails real?

Chemtrails Conspiracy Theory (The Keith Group @ Harvard University)
Contrails and Chemtrails (Metabunk)
Contrail Science
Chemtrails (The Skeptics Project)
Chemtards
Chemtrail conspiracy theory (Wikipedia)

Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Did Pfizer delay the announcement of a COVID-19 Vaccine to hurt Trump’s election chances?

No.

No, there is no evidence to support the claim that Pfizer delayed the announcement of their COVID-19 vaccine to hurt Trump’s election chances.

Pfizer, along with other pharmaceutical companies, began developing and testing their COVID-19 vaccines as soon as the virus began to spread. The clinical trials for the Pfizer vaccine began in July 2020 and continued through the fall. The company announced the results of their Phase 3 clinical trial, which showed the vaccine’s efficacy, on November 9, 2020.

The timing of the announcement was based on the completion of the clinical trial and the availability of data, not any political considerations. In fact, Pfizer’s CEO has stated that they did not receive any political pressure to delay the announcement, and that they were simply waiting for the data to be available.

It is important to rely on factual and credible sources of information and avoid spreading baseless conspiracy theories, especially when it comes to public health and safety.

Resources on: ‘Did Pfizer delay the announcement of a COVID-19 Vaccine to hurt Trump’s election chances?’:

From FactCheck: Trump Baselessly Alleges COVID-19 Vaccine Announcement Was Delayed
From Bloomberg: Pfizer’s News Raised Political Questions. We Have Answers.
From DailyDot: Conspiracy theory says Pfizer delayed vaccine news to hurt Trump
From SciMag: Fact check: No evidence supports Trump’s claim that COVID-19 vaccine result was suppressed to sway election

If you have any evidence that Pfizer did deliberately delay the announcement, then please contact us and we will link to it above.

Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)
Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Is Chronic Lyme Disease a real disease?

No, its not. Its a made up condition.

The existence of Chronic Lyme Disease (CLD) as a distinct clinical entity is a topic of much debate and controversy within the medical community.

Lyme disease is caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, which is transmitted to humans through the bite of infected ticks. It can cause a range of symptoms, including fever, fatigue, headache, and a characteristic skin rash. When diagnosed early and treated with antibiotics, most people recover from Lyme disease without complications.

However, some people report ongoing symptoms after being treated for Lyme disease, and this is often referred to as “chronic Lyme disease.” The symptoms may include fatigue, muscle and joint pain, cognitive difficulties, and other non-specific symptoms.

While there is evidence to suggest that some people may experience ongoing symptoms after being treated for Lyme disease, there is currently no scientific consensus on the cause, diagnosis, or treatment of CLD. The term “chronic Lyme disease” is not recognized by major medical organizations, such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), who do not consider it to be a distinct clinical entity.

It is important for individuals who are experiencing ongoing symptoms after being treated for Lyme disease to seek medical attention from a qualified healthcare provider. They can help determine the underlying cause of the symptoms and provide appropriate treatment.

Resources for: Is Chronic Lyme Disease a real disease?

From Skeptical Inquirer: Bogus Treatments For Bogus Diagnosis Are Killing Patients

From Wikipedia: Chronic Lyme disease

From The Conversation: Chronic Lyme disease – does it exist?

From Lyme Science: Chronic Lyme disease: A scam that should be condemned!

If you have any good peer reviewed science that says otherwise, please send it and if it stacks up to scrutiny it will be linked above.

Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)
Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Is COVID-19 no worse than the flu?

Of course its not. It much more fatal.

No, COVID-19 is not no worse than the flu. COVID-19 is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, while the flu is caused by influenza viruses, and they are distinct respiratory illnesses with different symptoms and potential health consequences.

COVID-19 can be more severe than the flu, particularly in certain populations, such as the elderly and those with underlying health conditions. COVID-19 can cause severe respiratory symptoms, including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and can also affect multiple organ systems. It can also cause long-term health consequences, such as “long COVID,” which can include persistent symptoms like fatigue, difficulty breathing, and cognitive impairment.

The flu, on the other hand, typically causes milder symptoms and is associated with fewer severe complications. However, the flu can also cause serious health problems, particularly in high-risk groups, such as young children, the elderly, and people with underlying health conditions.

COVID-19 is also more contagious than the flu, and the Delta variant of the virus, which has emerged recently, appears to be even more transmissible than earlier strains.

While both COVID-19 and the flu are respiratory illnesses that can cause serious health problems, COVID-19 is generally considered to be more severe and contagious than the flu. It is important to continue taking measures to prevent the spread of both illnesses, such as getting vaccinated, practicing good hygiene, and following public health guidelines.

Resources for: Is COVID-19 no worse than the flu?

From National Geographic: How scientists know COVID-19 is way deadlier than the flu

Please Note:

If you have any good peer reviewed science that says otherwise, please send it and if it stacks up to scrutiny it will be linked above.

Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)
Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

What is the “science has been wrong before” nonsense?

It a silly argument used when someone gets proved wrong by the actual evidence.

Yes, it is true that science has been wrong before. Science is a human endeavor, and as such, it is not infallible. Scientific theories and hypotheses are constantly being tested and refined, and sometimes, new evidence may lead to a revision or even a rejection of previously accepted ideas.

However, the scientific method is designed to minimize errors and biases as much as possible. The scientific method involves making observations, formulating hypotheses, designing experiments to test those hypotheses, and analyzing the results. Through this process, scientists aim to arrive at the most accurate and reliable explanation of the natural world.

When new evidence emerges that challenges current scientific thinking, the scientific community engages in a rigorous process of review, debate, and replication to determine the validity of the new findings. While scientific theories may change as new evidence emerges, the scientific process itself is designed to minimize errors and refine our understanding of the natural world over time.

Therefore, while it is important to acknowledge that science is not infallible, it remains the best available method we have for understanding the natural world and making informed decisions about health, medicine, and other aspects of our lives.

What is the “science has been wrong before” nonsense?

From Debunking Denialism: “Science Was Wrong Before!”

From Rational Wiki: Science was wrong before

From The Credible Hulk: The “Scientists Were Wrong” Gambit and the Science Denier’s Paradox

From The Credible Hulk: Incommensurability, The Correspondence Principle, and the “Scientists Were Wrong Before” Gambit

From The Credible Hulk: Science has been wrong before, therefore I can make up whatever bullshit I want.

From Skeptico: The appeal to “science was wrong before”

Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Are only 6% of the reported COVID-19 deaths due to COVID-19?

No. That is just conspiracy nut jobs proving how stupid they are.

No, the claim that only 6% of reported COVID-19 deaths are due to COVID-19 is based on a misinterpretation of data. The claim originated from a misreading of a weekly report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that described the underlying health conditions of people who had died from COVID-19 in the United States.

The report stated that 6% of the deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only cause of death, while the other 94% had additional underlying health conditions listed as contributing factors. However, this does not mean that only 6% of the reported COVID-19 deaths were actually caused by COVID-19. In fact, the report explicitly states that COVID-19 was listed as a contributing factor in all of the deaths.

COVID-19 can be a primary or contributing cause of death, depending on the individual case. It is also important to note that COVID-19 can cause serious health complications in people with underlying health conditions, such as diabetes, heart disease, or respiratory illnesses, which can contribute to their death.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDC consider COVID-19 to be a major public health threat and a leading cause of death worldwide. It is important to rely on factual and scientifically supported information when discussing the impact of COVID-19 on public health.

Resources for: Are only 6% of the reported COVID-19 deaths due to COVID-19?

From Respectful Insolence: The “only 6%” gambit: The latest viral COVID-19 disinformation

From ZDoggMD: THAT CDC 6% COVID DEATH RATE, EXPLAINED

From YouTube: The CDC did not remove 94% of COVID deaths

From MetaBunk: Claim: Only 6% of COVID deaths are “real” – the rest died due to comorbidities

From FactCheck: CDC Did Not ‘Admit Only 6%’ of Recorded Deaths from COVID-19

From the Logic of Science: COVID comorbidities are not analogous to car crashes: Debunking the 6% mortality claim

Please note:

If you have any credible sources that stack up to scrutiny and can actually refute the points made the above, then please contact us.

Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Are there fetal cells from aborted fetuses in vaccines?

No.

Some vaccines, particularly some of the older ones, were developed using cell lines derived from aborted fetuses. These cell lines are used to manufacture vaccines and to test their safety and efficacy. However, it is important to note that the vaccines themselves do not contain fetal cells.

One of the most commonly used cell lines is known as the “MRC-5” cell line, which was derived from lung tissue taken from a fetus that was aborted in 1966. Another commonly used cell line is the “WI-38” cell line, which was derived from lung tissue taken from a fetus that was aborted in 1962.

These cell lines have been used for several decades in the production of vaccines for diseases such as rubella, chickenpox, and hepatitis A. The use of these cell lines has helped to produce vaccines more efficiently and with greater safety and efficacy.

However, some people have ethical concerns about the use of these cell lines, as they were derived from aborted fetuses. It is important to note that there are no fetal cells in the vaccines themselves, and the use of these cell lines is carefully regulated by health authorities to ensure their safety and efficacy.

It is also important to note that some vaccines, such as the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, do not use fetal cell lines in their development or production.

Resources for: Are there fetal cells from aborted fetuses in vaccines?

From the ABC: Foetal cells are used to make the Oxford coronavirus vaccine. But they came from a foetus in 1973

From Science Based Medicine: “Aborted fetal tissue” and vaccines: Combining pseudoscience and religion to demonize vaccines

From Wikipedia: Use of fetal tissue in vaccine development

From Skeptical Raptor: DNA in vaccines and GMOs – they’re not going to turn you into Sasquatch

Please note:

If you have any actual evidence that there are fetal cells in vaccines, please send it to us and it will be listed above.

Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)
Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Is grounding / earthing for real?

No, its fake. Its mostly made up nonsense.

The idea behind grounding, or earthing, is that by connecting the body to the Earth’s surface, it is possible to absorb negatively charged electrons, which can reduce inflammation, pain, and other health problems. However, there is limited scientific evidence to support the claims that grounding is effective for treating health problems.

Some studies have suggested that grounding may have a beneficial effect on inflammation and immune function, as well as on sleep, heart rate variability, and cortisol levels. However, many of these studies have limitations, such as small sample sizes or lack of controls, and the results are not always consistent.

While there is some evidence to suggest that grounding may have some health benefits, more research is needed to fully understand the potential mechanisms and benefits of this practice. It is also important to note that grounding should not be used as a substitute for medical treatment, and individuals with health problems should always consult with their healthcare providers before trying any new therapies or treatments.

Resources for: Is grounding / earthing for real?

From ScienceBlogs: “Earthing” Is a Bunch of Crap

From Skeptic: Bogus Claims About Grounding Your Feet to Earth Promote Medical Pseudoscience

From Skeptoid: All About Grounding

From PodiaPaedia: Grounding

From RRJ: Grounding: Going barefoot to prevent cardiovascular disease!

From Podiatry Arena: Earthing (grounding) the human body reduces blood viscosity-a major factor in cardiovascular disease

From Skeptic Blog: Are You a Grounded Person?

From Its a Foot: ‘Grounding’ or ‘Earthing’ is still bollocks

Please note:

If you have any actual published peer reviewed science that grounding or earthing does actually work and that evidence stacks up to scrutiny, please please contact us and it will be added above.

Sale
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters
  • Nichols, Tom (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 280 Pages - 10/01/2018 (Publication Date) - Oxford University Press (Publisher)
Sale
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Using Facts, Logic, and Respect
  • Hardcover Book
  • West, Mick (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 304 Pages - 09/18/2018 (Publication Date) - Skyhorse Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe
  • Novella, Steven (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 528 Pages - 12/03/2019 (Publication Date) - Grand Central Publishing (Publisher)
Sale
The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines
  • Hardcover Book
  • Deer, Brian (Author)
  • English (Publication Language)
  • 408 Pages - 09/29/2020 (Publication Date) - Johns Hopkins University Press (Publisher)

I get commissions for purchases made through links on this website. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.